header-image

Close Encounters of the Metafictional Kind

WHY I INSULTED BRET EASTON ELLIS AND WHY IT’S HIS FAULT
DISCUSSED
Stuffed Animals in Sexual Positions, A Decent Chance of Nudity, Drug-Addled European Sex Odysseys, Designer Menswear, Minnesotan Theater People, The Albino Johnny Cash, Quasi-Gay Literati, Cool Ranch Doritos, Emo-Brit Fans, Stained Undershirts, The Jayster

Close Encounters of the Metafictional Kind

Garrett McDonough
Facebook icon Share via Facebook Twitter icon Share via Twitter

I first heard of Bret Easton Ellis my sophomore year in college, when I wrote a story in which a woman’s nipples were hooked up to a car battery and my professor said, “Isn’t this a scene from American Psycho?” Months later, I skipped my Monday classes to walk in the rain, thinking it would inspire me to write the short story that was due before Thursday. Hours later I was shivering so dramatically that I ducked into the Loews theater near Union Square and used my parents’ credit card to buy a ticket to the first non-animated show, one which starred the pumpkin-headed eponymous manchild of Dawson’s Creek and the now-frighteningly-butch-but-still-curvingly-­caliente ingenue from 7th Heaven. This was a time in my life when I had a ­hatred of all things sentimental, which meant I felt a special abhorrence for the now-deceased WB, the network that had given these stars their original icky twinkle, but the poster consisted of a chart of stuffed animals in various sexual positions and I figured there was a decent chance of nudity.

The movie, The Rules of Attraction, was about college students doing pretty much what I aspired to do ­every weekend (sex, drugs, a character that cryptically says “rock and roll” in response to any inquiry) in a way that was unequivocally repulsive, but, moreover, sad. In the final few minutes of the movie, each main character has an exchange that essentially goes:

weak, pathetic character: I just want to know you.

powerful but equally pathetic character: No one will ever know anyone.

Aesthetically, the movie was off the reservation—several narrators, the same scene acted out from different perspectives, sequences liter­ally rewound on screen, and a twenty-­minute monologue describing one character’s drug-­addled ­European sex odyssey. (I think the phrase “drug-addled European sex odyssey” may actually be spoken, and by several characters.) I couldn’t say I enjoyed the movie that first time I saw it, but its moral chill stuck with me, and prompted me to buy the movie tie-in book and read it on a median bench on Broadway in one afternoon. Then I read Less Than Zero, American Psycho, The Informers, and Glamorama that same week.

Ellis was a revelation to me for several reasons: First, he was funny, a trait then and now I value above all others, and he was funny in many ways at once—absurd, crass, witty, dark, satirical, pathetic, cathartic—but never unintentionally. Second, he was unafraid to be simple and...

You have reached your article limit

Sign up for a digital subscription and continue reading all new issues, plus our entire archives, for just $1.50/month.

More Reads
Essays

Out of the Woods

Conventional wisdom would have it that it’s unwise for a woman in her late thirties to walk away from a well-paying job and the prospect of marriage in order to hike the ...

Essays

A Scanner Darkly

Paul La Farge
Essays

Dr. Octagon

For much of the 1800s, Orson Squire Fowler was America’s foremost practitioner of phrenology. He pressed his fingertips against the skulls of the most famous men of ...

More