header-image

A Review of Encyclopedia Volume I, A-E Edited by Tisa Bryant, Miranda F. Mellis, and Kate Schatz

CENTRAL QUESTION: Is knowledge power or is power knowledge?

A Review of Encyclopedia Volume I, A-E Edited by Tisa Bryant, Miranda F. Mellis, and Kate Schatz

Rick Moody
Facebook icon Share via Facebook Twitter icon Share via Twitter

Denis Diderot is usually recognized as the first modern encyclopedist. After publishing ribald stories and other lesser works, Diderot decided to compile all the ideas of the Enlightenment. Diderot’s first volume was published in 1751, under the title Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers. The project earned him the undying enmity of the church, hostility from friends, and it took him twenty years to get to the letter z. These days, the success of web browsers like Google and online resources like Wikipedia make clear that the notion of the universal collection still has a powerful allure. Collecting everything, according to this view, would confer much wisdom upon the possessor thereof.

The encyclopedia we have before us has a much different ambition. Contributors to this self-published annual volume (who number among them literary eminences like Carole Maso, Eileen Myles, Samuel R. Delany, Diane Williams, and Brian Evenson, as well as critics, academics, and visual artists) were given five words, one each for letters a, b, c, d, and e, and asked to answer in each entry the following question: “What occurs under the sign of fiction?” If this question sounds a little bit like it was generated in the Brown University Modern Culture and Media program, that’s because the Encyclopedia was, in fact, birthed in the fertile womb of Brown U., hotbed of semiotica and experimental fiction (and, it should be noted, my alma mater). Those mildly afeard in the presence of post-structuralism (and its discontents) needn’t worry unduly. I personally have no idea what the “sign of fiction” is or means, but that didn’t inhibit my great enjoyment of Encyclopedia. Its design is much in imitation of the Golden Books period of American encyclopedias. It features a wealth of illustrations, as in Anna Joy Springer’s rebus about studying with “Acker, Kathy,” as well as an entire section of lavishly reproduced color plates. It boasts great interviews, as in Jacob Eichert’s entry “Exene” and Afua Kafi-Akua’s “Carter, Betty.” It reproduces the entirety of Jorge Luis Borges’s story “Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius,” which not only serves as an important precursor for this project but is one of the greatest of twentieth-century short stories: “Today, one of the churches of Tlön platonically maintains that a certain pain, a certain greenish tint of yellow, a certain temperature, a certain sound, are the only reality.”

There is a wealth of entries in Encyclopedia that genuflect in the direction of Borges’s archivist lingo, e.g., Mikhail Epstein’s celebration of the “catalogue”: “A thought in the catalogue is not attached to anything beyond itself. It is not issued on behalf...

You have reached your article limit

Sign up for a digital subscription and continue reading all new issues, plus our entire archives, for just $1.50/month.

More Reads
Reviews

ParaSpheres

Thomas March
Reviews

Darkness Spoken

Aimee Kelley
Reviews

Original White Animals

Stephanie Burt
More